"The Good Book says the meek shall inherit the earth and I expect that’s probably the truth. I ain’t no freethinker, but I’ll tell you what. I’m a long way from bein’ convinced that it’s all that good a thing."

-Cormac McCarthy,All The Pretty Horses

Well, look who’s back. Truth be told, this whole project was born out of frustration and boredom in Alabama, yet despite being dangerously close to financial insolvency in Texas, there just isn’t that much frustration and boredom left. Getting ready for college, buffing up on LaTeX, and trying to rehabilitate a 2,300 sq ft house doesn’t leave much room for thought. However, if there was nothing to turn over in my mind while herding chickens, there wouldn’t be much to publish.

One can’t help but notice something I like to call “Obamapocalypse”. Since his inauguration, as many of you might have noticed, there’s been a general aversion to the President, and it seems almost personal. I’ll bet anyone $10 that the word “socialist” hasn’t been thrown around with this much unfounded zeal since McCarthyism was in style. The latest grimace-inducing “political scandal”, that President Obama was fed dog meat as a child in Indonesia, is yet another in a long string of “so what?” moments that have plagued the Obama administration since the very beginning.

But let’s talk about an issue near and dear to my heart: Obamacare. If you were to read a few "conservative" rags, the consensus is that some 72% of Americans believe the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional and should be repealed. Now, for a little perspective: this is the poll to which they refer. Indeed, in the section “Americans Do Not Think Individual Mandate Passes Legal Muster”, you’ll see that 72% of Americans polled by GallupĀ ”think that this requirement [buy insurance or pay fine] is … unconstitutional”.

That doesn’t look good for the PPACA, does it? If 72% of Americans believe the act is unconstitutional, logic would follow that it is extremely unpopular; since it is extremely unpopular, and the United States of America follows the tenants of democracy, it must be repealed.

This logic is the butt end of my “Joe Six-Pack is an idiot” philosophy. The United States is a republic. In other words, individuals have the loudest voices but the least real political power, which is only underscored by the extent to which our opinion is influenced by pundits banging the drum. Ironically, many of these pundits are also the loudest opponents of judicial activism, while conveniently glossing over the fact that any Supreme Court ruling on the PPACA would be judicial activism, considering how little of the PPACA has actually been enacted. Even the Gallup poll notes that “few Americans report any effect of the law on their own healthcare situation”. Then again, if I get bricks through my window detailing the first Federal court ruling to question its constitutionality, perhaps my opinion on the matter would change. (Also, it would be a good excuse to finally use my renter’s insurance.)

I’ve found that the typical last straw in dead-in-the-water debates is for an opponent to ask, “Well, what do you think about it?” Personally, I’m against the individual mandate putting a fee to people who can’t afford health care. There are quite a few reasons for people not having health care coverage, but I’ve yet to find anyone who claims that they have inadequate health coverage because they accidentally funneled too much income into their investment portfolios to pay for health insurance. [That link was just a jaunty aside; however, it reinforces an interesting point that national economic expansion results from taxing everyone highly (pre-1960, mid- to late-90’s), whereas “Reaganomics” provides economic expansion solely on the backs of the middle class.] Even though Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution allows Congress “Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises … for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States”, how much longer can we ignore the rampant obesity that is contributing to the overall cost of health care in a much more frightening manner than a lack of insurance ever could? Though Denmark’s saturated fat tax is generally regarded as a nominal step, it is an example of governmental policy designed to further a more constructive form of tax revenue.

So, what am I trying to say? The fat get fatter, and everyone else pays. We’ve wasted enough time quibbling over the constitutionality of one part of a massive health care bill; how about we take some private time to admit to ourselves that a rash of uninsured people seeking medical help was the piece of sand that rubbed our national sedentary Big-Mac-slamming huge-soda-gulping oyster the wrong way? Hell, we play this one right, we might even be able to get a pearl out of it.

Apr 23 -
The things people talk about.

"In our leisure we reveal what kind of people we are." - Ovid